MVP Development
- Best for
- Proving an idea works before committing further budget
- Typical range
- $10K to $30K
- Typical timeline
- 3 to 6 weeks

Engagement Models
Some clients need one product built to a fixed price. Others need a team that stays. This page sets out exactly what each option costs you in commitment, what you get, and who it suits, so you can decide before you speak to us.
Compare at a glance
| Engagement | Best for | Typical range | Typical timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVP Development | Proving an idea works before committing further budget | $10K to $30K | 3 to 6 weeks |
| Full Product Development | Taking a validated product to production scale | $30K to $60K+ | 8 to 16 weeks |
| Custom Software and Internal Tools | Replacing manual processes and systems that no longer fit | Scoped per project | 4 to 12 weeks |
| Ongoing Support | Hosting, maintenance, and updates after launch | Fixed monthly | Ongoing |
Not sure which applies? Start with a discovery call. We will tell you which model fits, including when the answer is the smaller one.
Clear expectations, predictable delivery, and a model that flexes to your stage.
Pick the structure that matches your timeline and risk tolerance. Each model is designed to keep scope, ownership, and outcomes transparent.
Model 01
A defined build, a fixed price, and a date it finishes.
What it is
You know what you need built. We scope it in writing, quote a fixed figure, and deliver against agreed milestones. Nothing changes without a written change request, so the number you approve at the start is the number you pay at the end.
Best for
Includes
Model 02
A product squad that works only on you, month after month.
What it is
A named, cross functional team that operates as your engineering department. You set the priorities, they ship against them every week. No re-quoting for each new feature and no waiting for capacity, because the team is already yours.
Best for
Includes
Model 03
Senior engineering direction, without hiring a CTO.
What it is
A senior engineering lead who owns the technical decisions your product depends on. Architecture, stack choices, code standards, security posture, and oversight of whoever is doing the building, whether that is us, your team, or a third party.
Best for
Includes
Model 04
Idea to launched product, handled end to end.
What it is
For teams starting with a concept rather than a specification. We work through validation and scope first, build the product, and get it into the hands of real users. Delivered in phases, each with its own fixed price, so you can stop or change direction between phases rather than committing everything up front.
Best for
Includes
The engagement structure changes. The way we work does not.
Weekly delivery rhythm
Short feedback loops, clear milestones, and a written progress report every week. You never wait until launch day to find out where things stand.
Transparent scope and ownership
You always know what is in scope, what is coming next, and who is responsible for it. Anything outside the agreed scope is quoted before it is built, never after.
Quality guardrails
QA, performance testing and cross device checks on every release, against maintainable implementation standards rather than whatever ships fastest.
Security-minded delivery
Access on a least privilege basis, secure credential handling, and safe defaults applied from the first commit rather than retrofitted before launch.
Handover that scales
Clean structure, reusable components and real documentation, so your own team or your next partner can pick the work up without a rebuild.
Support after launch
Post launch support is included or available on every model, scaled to the engagement rather than sold as an afterthought.
Tell us what you are building and where you are with it. We will recommend the model that suits your stage, including when that means a smaller engagement than you came for.